<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Quagmire &#187; Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quagblog.com/category/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quagblog.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Conservative for Obama</title>
		<link>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/19/a-conservative-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/19/a-conservative-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Idiocracies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quagblog.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was written by Wick Allison, Editor in Chief of D Magazine.
THE MORE I LISTEN TO AND READ ABOUT “the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate,” the more I like him. Barack Obama strikes a chord with me like no political figure since Ronald Reagan. To explain why, I need to explain why I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was written by <a href="http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?nm=Core%20Pages&amp;type=gen&amp;mod=Core%20Pages&amp;tier=3&amp;gid=B33A5C6E2CF04C9596A3EF81822D9F8E&amp;fail=no" target="_blank">Wick Allison</a>, Editor in Chief of<a href="http://www.dmagazine.com/ME2/Default.asp" target="_blank"> D Magazine</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="drop">T</span>HE MORE I LISTEN TO AND READ ABOUT “the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate,” the more I like him. Barack Obama strikes a chord with me like no political figure since Ronald Reagan. To explain why, I need to explain why I am a conservative and what it means to me.</p>
<p>In 1964, at the age of 16, I organized the Dallas County Youth for Goldwater. My senior thesis at the University of Texas was on the conservative intellectual revival in America. Twenty years later, I was invited by William F. Buckley Jr. to join the board of <em>National Review</em>. I later became its publisher.</p>
<p>Conservatism to me is less a political philosophy than a stance, a recognition of the fallibility of man and of man’s institutions. Conservatives respect the past not for its antiquity but because it represents, as G.K. Chesterton said, the democracy of the dead; it gives the benefit of the doubt to customs and laws tried and tested in the crucible of time. Conservatives are skeptical of abstract theories and utopian schemes, doubtful that government is wiser than its citizens, and always ready to test any political program against actual results.</p>
<p>Liberalism always seemed to me to be a system of “oughts.” We ought to do this or that because it’s the right thing to do, regardless of whether it works or not. It is a doctrine based on intentions, not results, on feeling good rather than doing good.</p>
<p>But today it is so-called conservatives who are cemented to political programs when they clearly don’t work. The Bush tax cuts—a solution for which there was no real problem and which he refused to end even when the nation went to war—led to huge deficit spending and a $3 trillion growth in the federal debt. Facing this, John McCain pumps his “conservative” credentials by proposing even bigger tax cuts. Meanwhile, a movement that once fought for limited government has presided over the greatest growth of government in our history. That is not conservatism; it is profligacy using conservatism as a mask.</p>
<p>Today it is conservatives, not liberals, who talk with alarming bellicosity about making the world “safe for democracy.” It is John McCain who says America’s job is to “defeat evil,” a theological expansion of the nation’s mission that would make George Washington cough out his wooden teeth.</p>
<p>This kind of conservatism, which is not conservative at all, has produced financial mismanagement, the waste of human lives, the loss of moral authority, and the wreckage of our economy that McCain now threatens to make worse.</p>
<p>Barack Obama is not my ideal candidate for president. (In fact, I made the maximum donation to John McCain during the primaries, when there was still hope he might come to his senses.) But I now see that Obama is almost the ideal candidate for this moment in American history. I disagree with him on many issues. But those don’t matter as much as what Obama offers, which is a deeply conservative view of the world. Nobody can read Obama’s books (which, it is worth noting, he wrote himself) or listen to him speak without realizing that this is a thoughtful, pragmatic, and prudent man. It gives me comfort just to think that after eight years of George W. Bush we will have a president who has actually read the Federalist Papers.</p>
<p>Most important, Obama will be a realist. I doubt he will taunt Russia, as McCain has, at the very moment when our national interest requires it as an ally. The crucial distinction in my mind is that, unlike John McCain, I am convinced he will not impulsively take us into another war unless American national interests are directly threatened.</p>
<p>“Every great cause,” Eric Hoffer wrote, “begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.” As a cause, conservatism may be dead. But as a stance, as a way of making judgments in a complex and difficult world, I believe it is very much alive in the instincts and predispositions of a liberal named Barack Obama&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/19/a-conservative-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain/Palin &#8211; No Maverick</title>
		<link>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/10/mccainpalin-no-maverick/</link>
		<comments>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/10/mccainpalin-no-maverick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Idiocracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quagblog.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Obama Ad. McCain and Palin are NOT Mavericks. Same of the old.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Obama Ad. McCain and Palin are NOT Mavericks. Same of the old.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NBtbG5xjFBY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NBtbG5xjFBY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/10/mccainpalin-no-maverick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama Should be President</title>
		<link>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/08/why-obama-should-be-president/</link>
		<comments>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/08/why-obama-should-be-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quagblog.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Why Obama Should Be President
Let’s get right past that notion  that someone deserves to be President.  Nobody deserves the presidency.   Hell, no one should even want the presidency.  It is one  of the most stressful jobs on the face of the earth; it consumes all  of your time, thoughts and energy, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Why Obama Should Be President</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Let’s get right past that notion  that someone deserves to be President.  Nobody deserves the presidency.   Hell, no one should even <em>want</em> the presidency.  It is one  of the most stressful jobs on the face of the earth; it consumes all  of your time, thoughts and energy, you’re lucky if you make it out  alive or at least without a couple of assassination attempts, and quite  frankly, there will always be some contingent of the population that  hates you.  The Presidency of the United States is not a privilege.   It is a <em>duty</em>, a responsibility to over 300 million people and  a historical legacy.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Let’s also get over this idea of  experience.  The only people who have the “experience” to be  president are the people who have already <em>been</em> president—and  sometimes, not even them.  I think we can all safely say that after  7 years in office, George W. Bush is still no more qualified to be president  than the guy who cleans the White House bathrooms.  In fact, he’s  probably less qualified than the guy who cleans the Whit House bathrooms.   Maybe that guy should run for office.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">What the President needs is a certain  personality type, a temperament, an ability to speak to inspire the  people, the ability to compromise and to stand firm, to look beyond  political lines and make decisions that are best for the country, whether  or not they are best for <em>him.</em> He needs to be educated but  not so caught up with ethereal pursuits that he neglects the practical  matters of the American people.  He needs to know what people care  about.  He needs to take criticism and use it to better himself  and his performance, not to bandy it about as a grudge.  He needs  to select quality advisors with a wide array of viewpoints and backgrounds  to help him make decisions that he himself is not qualified to make,  for no man can be a master of all things.  He needs to understand  and cherish the Constitution that he swears to uphold.  He needs  to understand that he serves at the pleasure of the people, that this  government should be one by the people, for the people and of the people.   And for God’s sake, let him have some common sense.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Of the candidates running for the Office  of the President of the United States of America right now, September  2008, it is my honest opinion that Barack Obama is the best choice.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Truth be told, Obama is young and many  say, inexperienced in Executive Office.  And God I hope so.   Let’s have someone who hasn’t yet sold their soul just to keep their  congressional seat.  Let’s have someone who still holds on to  youthful idealism because the cynical partisanship that permeates the  capital has done nothing for this nation but drive it apart. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Yet people will still argue, what experience  does Obama have?</span></p>
<p>Well, let’s start at the beginning.  He’s experienced what  millions of other Americans have experienced: growing up with a single,  working mother, the child of an interracial relationship, never really  knowing his father.  Put himself through college, graduating from  Columbia University, then working as a community organizer for three  years with a church-based organization originally comprised of eight  Catholic parishes in the south side of Chicago, where he helped set  up a job training program, a college prep tutoring program and a tenants  rights organization.  He went on to Harvard Law school, where he  was selected as an editor, and then later the president of, the Harvard  Law Review.  He taught constitutional law at the University of  Chicago Law School for 12 years and also joined a law firm that specialized  in civil rights litigation and neighborhood economic development.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">In 1996, he was elected to the Illinois  Senate where he served until 2004, following his election to the US  Senate.  He has served as a United States Senator for the past  three years.  One of his sponsored legislative acts included the  Coburn-Obama Transparency Act, which established </span><a href="http://www.usapending.gov/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria; color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">www.USApending.gov</span></span></a><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">, a web search engine on government spending.   He also sponsored the “Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security  and Democracy Promotion Act,” signed into law by President Bush in  December, 2006.  He sponsored the Honest Leadership and Open Government  Act, signed into law in September 2007.   He also sponsored  an amendment to the Defense Authorization Act adding safeguards for  personality disorder military discharges.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">He has sat on the Senate Committees  for Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works and Veterans&#8217; Affairs,  as well as Health, Labor and Pensions, Education and Homeland Security  and Governmental Affairs.  He is the chairman of the subcommittee  on European Affairs. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">That’s quite a bit of experience,  I’d say.  In fact, isn’t that the epitome of the American Dream?   A man who works his way up from the bottom, his hard work gives way  to success, his success allows him to give back to the community?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">But what about his political positions? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">Well, he was an opponent of the Iraq  War, and spoke out against it on numerous occasions.  He would  like to eliminate all nuclear weapons, eventually.  He believes  in direct presidential diplomacy with foreign enemies but is not against  using force when necessary.  He has called for action against the  genocide in Darfur, has divested his holdings of Sudan-related stock  and urges divestment from companies doing business in Iran.  He  opposes privatized Social Security.  He supports universal healthcare.   He proposes to reward teachers on a merit-based pay system.  He  would eliminate taxes for seniors with incomes of less than $50k a year,  close corporate tax loopholes, and proposed a cap and trade auction  system to restrict carbon emissions.  He prefers transparency in  government.  He wants to actively promote advancements in science  and technology. He is pro-choice. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;"> Of course, you didn’t need me to  write all this.  You could have looked it up on Wikipedia or gone  to BarackObama.com and found it out.  Or you could have let the  news media tell you what they want you to know.  All too often  we let ourselves be fed a narrative crafted in bits and pieces by people  we don’t know, don’t really trust, but are willing to follow.   The ones who ask questions like, “Is Barack Obama a Muslim?” when  mere hours before, they were reporting on him being  a member of  a radical black Christian church.  They want you to know that Obama  knows what arugula is, even if you don’t, and he prefers orange juice  to coffee in the mornings.  Clearly, he’s nothing like you, even  though some of you like orange juice in the morning and chances are,  you’ve eaten arugula, or you make your living by growing arugula,  or shockingly, you even know what arugula looks like. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">So why do I think Barack Obama should  be president?  Because he’s got that temperament a president  needs—he’s not easily ruffled or stressed, he keeps calm under pressure,  he can still crack a joke, even at himself.  When he speaks, people  listen and are inspired—he has already drawn unprecedented numbers  of young people out to get involve—he has even inspired some Republicans  to cross party lines.  He is willing to compromise, but to be firm  when it is required.  He’ll do what’s best and honest, even  when it is not good for him.  He was up front about his drug use  in high school, even when he didn’t need to be, and he admits when  he is wrong.  He is educated.  He has studied and understands  far better than most of us the Constitution that he will swear to protect.   He has quality advisors—and they have helped him build one of the  most efficient, successful grassroots campaigns in history.  He  is not searching for power, or a position he feels is owed to him.   He understands that the President answers to the people.  He encourages  it.  It’s about time that someone did.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Cambria;">I, for one, would appreciate the change.</span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quagblog.com/2008/09/08/why-obama-should-be-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
